From yearly plan to ready lesson in one click
Lesson prep now links directly to yearly plan periods. Period chip on the lesson hub, coverage badge on the yearly plan, and AI seed that pre-fills the lesson from the period's curriculum aims. Built on Wiliam's (2018) backwards-design principle — plan from intended learning, not topics — and Hattie's (2012) teacher-clarity effect (d=0.84).
Period chip on the lesson
Each lesson shows which yearly plan period it belongs to — clear for both teacher and student.
Coverage badge on the plan
The yearly plan period shows how many lessons are already prepared toward the goal.
AI seed from period
AI pre-fills the lesson from the period's topics, aims and student level.
Curriculum coverage tracked
When the lesson is ready, coverage in the yearly plan updates automatically.
Auto-prefill
Click a period → create lesson → title, aims and duration are already filled in.
Two-way link
Jump from yearly plan to lesson and back — same planning loop.
Curriculum version-aware
The resolver handles both legacy and updated curricula per subject and year — teachers don't have to remember.
In the classroom
Subject teacher
Prep goes from blank screen to 80% filled in 5 seconds.
Subject team
Whole team sees which periods are missing lessons — no gaps.
School leader
Curriculum coverage per year group shows live — without asking the teachers.
For subject teachers and for school leadership
Teachers escape the blank-screen problem: one click on a yearly plan period creates the lesson with title, learning aims, duration and suggested activities pre-filled. Marzano (2017) shows that this kind of scaffold — starting planning from the learning aim, not the topic — is the most robust predictor of pupil outcomes.
- 80% filled in 5 seconds
- AI builds on the period's curriculum aims
- Two-way link — jump back and forth
Leadership gets coverage badges on every yearly plan period — making it visible whether a year group has gaps in curriculum coverage. Hattie's (2012) teacher-clarity effect (d=0.84) is large, but depends on coherent planning — this coupling guarantees every lesson directly references the yearly plan's learning aims.
- Coverage badge per period per year group
- Spot gaps before the parents' evening
- Ready for the quality report — no extra work
Research base
The yearly-plan ↔ lesson coupling is grounded in international planning research and national curricula.
- Wiliam, D. (2018). Embedded Formative Assessment (2nd ed.) — Planning that backwards-maps from intended learning. Solution Tree Press
- Hattie, J. (2012). Visible Learning for Teachers — Teacher clarity (d=0.84), learning intentions and success criteria. Routledge
- Marzano, R. (2017). The New Art and Science of Teaching — Curriculum coverage and progression. Solution Tree Press
- Børne- og Undervisningsministeriet (2023). Fælles Mål — fag og formål for grundskolen. emu.dk source
- Børne- og Undervisningsministeriet (2024). Fagfornyelsen 2026 — rammer og udrulningsplan. uvm.dk source
- OECD (2020). Curriculum (Re)design — A series of thematic reports from the OECD Education 2030 project. OECD Publishing source
- Department for Education (UK) (2014). The national curriculum in England — Framework document. GOV.UK source
Frequently asked questions
Ready to try it?
Get a free demo for your school — we'll show you the whole platform in 30 minutes.